That gave the writers of this movie room to create a new vision of James Bond for the 21st century, rather than mold the character to fit viewer expectations for what a Daniel Craig character must be like. While audiences may have seen Craig in past motion pictures like Road to Perdition, most were going into Casino Royale with no real perception of who he was or what he was capable of. In other words, this version of Bond will be about the actor playing him rather than the eternally popular character. The audience’s preconceived notions of this performer and his legacy as a leading man will be what paints people’s perception of this incarnation of Bond. Casting Cavill, for instance, means that the latest iteration of 007 will forever be working in the shadow of Cavill’s prior roles, including his work as a spy in projects like the upcoming Argylle or The Man from U.N.C.L.E and not to mention the role that made him a household name - Superman. By and large, casting a new James Bond actor means looking beyond who’s a hot commodity in theatrical cinema at the time.Īnd why wouldn’t it be? Attaching a big name to the property may sound like a recipe for great marketing on paper, but it provides a world of problems for this new incarnation of Bond. Even these two, though, were not heavily experienced in being leading men in movies prior to their first James Bond outings. The closest exceptions to this phenomenon are Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan, who did gain notoriety on TV thanks to headlining the programs like The Saint and Remington Steele, respectively. He did lead movies like Layer Cake and Enduring Love before becoming Bond, but that still didn't make as big a name as say, Idris Elba is now. Timothy Dalton, for instance, had only a handful of major movies to his name (like Flash Gordon) before he first tackled 007 while Daniel Craig's pre- Casino Royale gigs included a few supporting roles (including occasional blockbusters like Lara Croft: Tomb Raider), but he wasn’t a go-to leading man by any means. RELATED: Lashana Lynch Discusses Her James Bond Character’s Future in the Franchise James Bond Is Usually Played By Initially Unknown Actors This established a precedent for future Bond actors, who weren’t massive draws on the big screen. No, namely anchoring the Disney family movie Darby O'Gill and the Little People, but he was far from a household name. Sean Connery had acting credits to his name before he first played James Bond in Dr. Throughout history, the actors who’ve taken on the role of James Bond were largely unknown to the general public. If nothing else, going this direction would cement the next performer to take up the mantle of 007 as being very much in the vein of his predecessors. Though it may seem like a marketing risk on paper, it’d be best, for a multitude of reasons, for an unknown actor to take up the mantle of James Bond next. While such talented leading men would doubtlessly make for fun iterations of 007, the best route to recasting this iconic character would be eschewing anyone already on the pop culture radar. The internet has become obsessed with certain people tackling the part, including Idris Elba and Henry Cavill. Now that Daniel Craig’s tenure as James Bond has come to an end with No Time to Die, the inevitable speculation over who will play the role next has begun.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |